Avast vs avira vs bitdefender vs eset vs kaspersky lab

#Avast vs avira vs bitdefender vs eset vs kaspersky lab plus

Obviously, Microsoft Security Essentials 1.0 was still in beta in the first half of August 2009. We used new malware appeared between the 11th and 17th of August 2009,вЂќ AV-Comparatives noted.

This test shows the proactive detection capabilities that the products had at that time. вЂњThe products used the same updates and signatures they had the 10th August, and the same highest detection settings were used.

#Avast vs avira vs bitdefender vs eset vs kaspersky lab plus

According to AV-Comparatives, Microsoft Security Essentials 1.0 outperformed no less than 10 rival products for heuristics detection.ДЄV-Comparatives compared a total of 16 products from various security companies, including Avira AntiVir Premium 9.0.0.446, G DATA Antivirus 20.0.4.9, Kaspersky AntiVirus 9.0.0.463, ESET NOD32 Antivirus 4.0.437.0, F-Secure Antivirus 10.00.246, Microsoft Security Essentials 1.0 beta, Avast Professional Edition, BitDefender Antivirus 13.0.13.254, eScan AntiVirus 10.0.997.491, AVG Antivirus 8.5.406, Trustport Antivirus 2., McAfee VirusScan Plus 13.11.102, Symantec Norton Antivirus 17.0.0.136, Sophos Antivirus 7.6.10, Norman Antivirus & AntiSpyware 7.10.02, and Kingsoft Antivirus 2009.08.05.16. In fact, Microsoft Security Essentials 1.0, formerly codenamed Morro, fared better than the products from security companies that were fast to downplay the relevance of a free basic solution from the Redmond company.

Believe it or not, but the recently introduced, free security solution from Microsoft manages to hold its own against fully-fledged, paid security suites from heavyweight players on the security market, at least when it comes down to generic detection and heuristic techniques.